Senator Schatz Reveals Plan To Hold Up State Department Nominee Confirmation Process

Senator Brian Schatz is pushing back against the Trump administration’s attempt to dismantle USAID, vowing to block all State Department nominations.

Key Insights

Sen. Schatz opposes the dismantling of USAID, calling it illegal and a threat to national safety.
The senator said he would use Senate rules to hold up the confirmation process for State Department nominees.
USAID has been locked down, with employees laid off and programs closed.
Trump and his advisers, including Elon Musk, criticize USAID for alleged waste and fraud.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has taken over as USAID’s acting director, citing unresponsiveness to State Department directives.

Schatz’s Move Against Possible USAID Dismantling

U.S. Senator Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, is pushing back against the Trump administration’s recent actions targeting the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). In a move that has caught the attention of both sides of the political aisle, Schatz has declared his intention to place a hold on all State Department nominees until USAID is restored as an independent agency.

The senator’s decision comes in response to what he describes as an illegal attempt to dismantle USAID, an agency established by federal law in 1961 to administer humanitarian aid programs globally. With an annual budget of approximately $40 billion, USAID has been a significant player in U.S. foreign policy and international development efforts for decades.

READ: Democratic Senator Says He'll Put a Hold on Trump’s State Department Nominations 👇https://t.co/i4tapVEMQy

— The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) February 3, 2025

The Controversy Surrounding USAID

The Trump administration, along with advisers such as Elon Musk, has targeted USAID as part of a broader effort to reduce the size of the federal government and freeze international aid. President Trump has accused the agency of waste and fraud, with a White House spokesperson citing specific funded projects as examples of “insane priorities.”

The situation has escalated rapidly, with USAID’s headquarters being locked down, employees laid off, and programs closed. The agency’s website and social media accounts have been taken down, effectively shutting off communication channels with the public and international partners.

Schatz’s Strategy and Its Implications

Senator Schatz’s decision to use Senate rules to block nominations is a move that could have far-reaching consequences. By placing a hold on all State Department nominees, Schatz aims to pressure the administration into reversing its actions against USAID. This strategy affects high-profile nominations, including that of Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

“Until and unless this brazenly authoritarian action is reversed and USAID is functional again, I will be placing a blanket hold on all of the Trump administration’s State Department nominees. This is self-inflicted chaos of epic proportions that will have dangerous consequences all around the world,” Schatz said.

Schatz is not alone in his opposition. Other Democratic lawmakers, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), have joined in placing holds and protesting against the reorganization of USAID. This unified front presents a significant challenge to the administration’s plans. The hold doesn’t completely block nominations but forces the Senate to use up significantly more time on voting to move forward with promotions and nominations.

The Administration’s Perspective

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has taken over as USAID’s acting director, defends the administration’s actions. Rubio argues that USAID has been unresponsive to State Department directives and needs to be aligned with U.S. policy and national interests.

The administration’s supporters, including Karoline Leavitt, argue that the move is necessary to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly. They cite concerns about the agency’s priorities and effectiveness in advancing U.S. interests abroad.

The Road Ahead

As the standoff continues, the future of USAID and U.S. foreign aid policy remains uncertain. Senator Schatz believes that attempts to dissolve USAID will be temporarily halted by the courts, as it is a department established by federal law. However, the administration’s determination to reshape the agency suggests that this controversy is far from over.

The situation raises important questions about the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, the role of foreign aid in U.S. foreign policy, and the process by which long-standing government agencies can be reformed or dismantled. As both sides dig in, the American public and international observers will be watching closely to see how this high-stakes political battle unfolds.